.

Showing posts with label ΙΗΣΟΥΣ: ΓΕΝΝΗΣΗ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ΙΗΣΟΥΣ: ΓΕΝΝΗΣΗ. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 21, 2021

Origen's view
on birthdays /

Η άποψη του Ωριγένη
για τα γενέθλια

 

 

 



Origenes Band 6 vol.1 Homilien zum Hexateuch in Rufins Übersetzung.
Teil 1 Die Homilien zu Genesis, Exodus und Leviticus

(ed. W.A. Baehrens), Leipzig 1920, pp. 396, 397.
 



Origen, Homilies on Levitcus
(transl. G.W. Barkley),
The Catholic University of America Press, 1990, p. 156.
 
 
Κανείς από όλους τους αγίους δεν υπάρχει που να τηρούσε μια ξεχωριστή μέρα γιορτής ή να έκανε μεγάλη γιορτή την ημέρα της γέννησής του. Κανείς δεν υπάρχει που να διασκέδαζε την ημέρα της γέννησης του γιου ή της κόρης του. Μόνο αμαρτωλοί χαίρονται με τέτοια γενέθλια. Διότι πράγματι υπάρχει στην Παλαιά Διαθήκη ο Φαραώ, ο βασιλιάς της Αιγύπτου, ο οποίος γιορτάζει την ημέρα της γέννησής του κάνοντας γιορτή, και στην Καινή Διαθήκη, ο Ηρώδης. Όμως, και οι δυο τους κηλίδωσαν τη γιορτή της γέννησής τους με έκχυση ανθρώπινου αίματος. Διότι ο Φαραώ σκότωσε τον "αρχισιτοποιό", και ο Ηρώδης τον άγιο προφήτη Ιωάννη "στη φυλακή". Αλλά οι άγιοι όχι μόνο δεν κάνουν γιορτή την ημέρα της γέννησής τους, αλλά, γεμάτοι με Άγιο Πνεύμα, καταριούνται εκείνη την ημέρα.
Also:
 
<Καὶ> ὁ μὲν Ἡρώδης, κρατήσας τὸν Ἰωάννην, δήσας ἀπέθετο ἐν τῇ φυλακῇ, μὴ τολμῶν πάντη ἀποκτεῖναι «τὸν προφητικὸν λόγον» καὶ ἀνελεῖν ἀπὸ τοῦ λαοῦ· ἡ δὲ τοῦ βασιλέως τῆς Τραχωνίτιδος γυνή, πονηρά τις οὖσα δόξα καὶ μοχθηρὰ (10) διδασκαλία, θυγατέρα ἐγέννησεν ὁμώνυμον, ἧς τὰ δοκοῦντα εὔρυθμα κινήματα ἀρέσαντα τῷ Ἡρώδῃ τὰ γενέσεως ἀγαπῶντι πράγματα, αἴτια γεγένηται τοῦ μηκέτι εἶναι ἐν τῷ λαῷ κεφαλὴν προφητικήν. Μέχρι δὲ τοῦ δεῦρο νομίζω τὰ δοκοῦντα κατὰ τὸν νόμον εἶναι κινήματα τοῦ λαοῦ τῶν (15) Ἰουδαίων μὴ ἄλλο τι τυγχάνειν ἢ τῆς Ἡρωδιάδος θυγατρός. Ἀλλ’ ἡ Ἡρωδιάδος ὄρχησις ἐναντία ἦν ὀρχήσει ἁγίᾳ, ἣν οἱ μὴ ὀρχησάμενοι ὀνειδισθήσονται ἀκούοντες· «Ηὐλήσαμεν ὑμῖν καὶ οὐκ ὠρχήσασθε.» Καὶ ἐν γενεθλίοις δὲ παρανόμου βασιλεύοντος αὐτῶν λόγου ὀρχοῦνται, ὡς ἀρέσκειν ἐκείνῳ τῷ λόγῳ τὰς κινήσεις αὐτῶν. Ἐτήρησε μὲν οὖν τις τῶν πρὸ ἡμῶν τὴν ἀναγεγραμμένην ἐν Γενέσει τοῦ Φαραὼ γενέθλιον καὶ διηγήσατο ὅτι ὁ φαῦλος τὰ γενέσεως ἀγαπῶν πράγματα ἑορτάζει γενέθλιον. Ἡμεῖς δὲ ἀπ’ ἐκείνου ταύτην εὑρόντες ἀφορμὴν ἐπ’ οὐδεμιᾶς γραφῆς εὕρομεν ὑπὸ δικαίου γενέθλιον (25) ἀγομένην. Ἄδικος γὰρ μᾶλλον ἐκείνου τοῦ Φαραὼ ὁ Ἡρώδης· καὶ γὰρ ὑπ’ ἐκείνου μὲν ἐν γενεθλίῳ ἀρχισιτοποιὸς ἀναιρεῖται, ὑπὸ δὲ τούτου Ἰωάννης, οὗ «μείζων ἐν γεννητοῖς γυναικῶν οὐδεὶς ἐγήγερται», περὶ οὗ ὁ σωτὴρ λέγει· «Ἀλλὰ τί ἐξεληλύθατε; προφήτην ἰδεῖν; ναὶ λέγω   (30) ὑμῖν, καὶ περισσότερον προφήτου.»

Origenes, Commentarium in evangelium Matthaei
[Εις το Κατά Ματθαίον Ευαγγέλιον Εξηγητικών] 10.22. *

[R. Girod, Origène. Commentaire sur l'évangile selon Matthieu, vol. 1 (Sources chrétiennes 162.
Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1970)]

 

Wednesday, December 30, 2020

About the star
that led certain magi
to the newborn Jesus at Bethlehem/

Περί του άστρου
που οδήγησε κάποιους μάγους
στον νεογέννητο Ιησού στη Βηθλεέμ

 


 

Anyone familiar with the narratives about Christ’s birth is aware that a star led certain magi to the newborn Jesus—details that are found only in Matthew’s Gospel (Matt 2:1-12 versus Luke 2:1-21). Was this star that appeared at Jesus’s birth a great conjunction, or was it some other kind of astronomical occurrence such as a supernova or comet? A close look at Matthew’s birth narrative indicates that the star seen by the magi cannot be reconciled easily with any natural, astronomical occurrence. First of all, it is by observing this star’s rising in the sky that the magi gain the knowledge that they must find “the newborn King of the Jews” (2:2) in Jerusalem where they travel from their distant “Eastern lands” (2:1). Moreover, this same star later leads them accurately from Jerusalem to Bethlehem, at which point the star finally stops above the house of Mary and Joseph where the newborn Jesus is to be found (2:9-11).

Because of the strangeness of this star, John Chrysostom and commentators followed by him have surmised that this was really an angel appearing as a star (Hom. Matt. 6). Nevertheless, pagans and Jews of the AD first century did believe that astronomical events and other heavenly signs defying natural conventions could signify the birth of a great king, or function as a sign of some notable person’s death, as well as signifying other events of cosmic importance. As a sign of Jerusalem’s impending destruction by the Romans in AD 70, the Jewish historian Josephus notes that there had been “a star resembling a sword that appeared over the city, and a comet that continued for an entire year” (J.W. 6.289-290). Josephus states that God “in many ways pre-signifies to our human race the acts of salvation,” while adding that many Jews at that time were misled by an “ambiguous oracle found in the sacred Scriptures” that “one from their land will rule the inhabited earth” (J.W. 6.310-313). Josephus is referring to the Balaam oracle of Numbers 24:17 which many Jews believed predicted the coming of the Jewish Messiah. Balaam was a pagan seer who was called by the pagan King Balak of Moab to inflict a harmful curse on the Israelites as they camped near Jericho before entering the Promised Land. However, Balaam was unable to do this because God inspired him to bless and utter prophecies about the people of Israel. Balaam says these important words in his oracle: “A star will rise out of Jacob, and a person will rise out of Israel” (LXX, ἀνατελεῖ ἄστρον ἐξ Ιακωβ, καὶ ἀναστήσεται ἄνθρωπος ἐξ Ισραηλ, Num 24:17). Balaam’s words were understood to be a prophecy about Israel’s Messiah by Jews of Josephus’s day and earlier (such as by the Qumran Essenes in the Dead Sea Scrolls). It should not be surprising, then, that the Balaam oracle and its reference to a messianic star functions as a backdrop to Matthew’s presentation of the magi, as well as contributing to the astronomical, indeed cosmic, significance of Jesus’s birth as God’s Messiah.

 In Matthew’s Gospel, the magi are referred to in Greek as μάγοι (magoi).  In antiquity, magi is a general term that can refer to astrologers, seers, soothsayers, dream interpreters, and magicians that used various methods of divination to predict the future. Balaam himself is referred to positively as a μάγος (magos) by Philo of Alexandria (Mos. 1, 276), while Eusebius of Caesarea refers to the magi in Matthew’s Gospel as “Balaam’s successors” (Dem. ev. 9.1). The specialized knowledge of such seers and astrologers has contributed to the magi of Matthew’s Gospel being referred to as “wise men,” a translation which in my view miscasts the presentation of the magi in Jesus’s birth narrative. Moreover, references in popular Christmas carols to “three kings” further obscures the magi’s role in Matthew’s Gospel since they are not presented as kings, and the reader is never told that they are three in number, but only that the magi offered three gifts: gold, frankincense, and myrrh. Rather, early Christian art has portrayed two, three, four, and eight magi, while the Syriac tradition has suggested that there were twelve magi present at Jesus’ birth. Although the term μάγος (magos) can be used pejoratively at other places in the Greek New Testament to mean “magician” (e.g. Acts 13:6-11), in Matthew’s birth narrative the magi are portrayed in an exclusively positive light. The magi in Matthew’s birth narrative are pagan astrologers (i.e. Gentiles) who use their specialized religious knowledge to approach Jesus the Messiah. However, their religious knowledge is limited: it does not allow them to make it all the way to Jesus. For this to occur, these Gentiles need the help of the Hebrew Scriptures. It is God’s revelation in the Hebrew Scriptures that informs the magi more precisely that the one to be born in Bethlehem is not only the King of the Jews, but the world’s Messiah (the Christ, ὁ χριστὸς, Matt 2:4). There is irony in Matthew’s narrative as King Herod the Great and certain Jewish religious authorities, having the benefit of the Hebrew Scriptures, do not travel to Bethlehem to find the newborn Messiah. Rather, Herod conspires to kill the newborn Christ, but he will not find him (2:13-23), whereas the Gentile magi are led by a star to find Christ and worship him. Moreover, Matthew has skillfully used this plot to kill Jesus as a proleptic passion narrative, foreshadowing the plot by certain Jewish religious authorities at the end of Jesus’s life who conspire to have Jesus crucified. So, too, the magi who see the cosmic sign of the star at Jesus’s birth foreshadow certain Gentiles coming to worship Jesus after his death, fulfilled by a group of Gentile Roman soldiers who see the cosmic sign of an earthquake at the crucifixion and confess that Jesus truly was the Son of God (27:54). These threads reach their dramatic conclusion at the end of Matthew’s Gospel when Jesus appears to the eleven disciples after his resurrection, commanding them to “make disciples of all nations” (i.e. Jews and Gentiles) while also promising to be with his followers until the end of the age (28:16-20).

* John Fotopoulos, "Christmas’s Great Conjunction,"
publicorthodoxy.org, December 24, 2020.