Byzantine monasteries: When defrauding is not called by its name /Βυζαντινά μοναστήρια: Όταν η απάτη δεν λέγεται με το όνομά της

 

* Κωνσταντίνος Γ. Πιτσάκης,
«Έγκλημα χωρίς τιμωρία; Τα πλαστά στη βυζαντινή ιστορία»,
στο Σπύρος Τρωιάνος (επιμ.),
Έγκλημα και τιμωρία στο Βυζάντιο,
Ίδρυμα Γουλανδρή-Χορν, 1997, σ. 381.

Ο αφορισμός & η κατάρα εναντίον εκείνου που αδικεί οικονομικά ένα μοναστήρι: Μονή Κουτλουμουσίου κατά Νικολάκη Χάστα /Excommunication & curse against a Church member for financial reasons towards the Koutloumousiou monastery

    ☩ Προκόπιος ἐλέῳ Θεοῦ ἀρχιεπίσκοπος Κωνσταντινουπόλεως Νέας Ῥώμης καὶ οἰκουμενικὸς πατριάρχης ☩

    ☩ Ἱερώτατε ἀρχιεπίσκοπε Προικονήσου ἐν ἁγίῳ πν(εύματι) ἀγαπητὲ ἀδελφὲ καὶ συλλειτουργέ, καὶ ἐντιμότατοι κληρικοί, εὐλαβέστατοι ἱερεῖς, χρήσιμοι γέροντες καὶ προεστῶτες τῆς ἐπαρχίας ταύτης,

χάρις εἴη ὑμῖν καὶ εἰρήνη παρὰ Θεοῦ. Οἱ ὁσιώτατοι πατέρες τοῦ κατὰ τὸ ἁγιώνυμον ὄρος τοῦ Ἄθωνος ἱεροῦ καὶ σεβασμίου ἡμετέρου πατριαρχικοῦ καὶ σταυροπηγιακοῦ μοναστηρίου τοῦ Κουτλουμουσίου ἀνήγγειλαν ἡμῖν ὅτι ὁ ποτὲ Τριαντάφυλλος τοῦ Μανολάκη, ἀπὸ χωρίου Ἀλώνης τῆς ἐπαρχίας ταύτης, ἐν τοῖς ζῶσι διατελῶν περιερχόμενος χάριν προσκυνήσεως εἰς τὸ ἁγιώνυμον ὄρος, ἐπορεύθη καὶ εἰς τὸ ῥηθὲν μοναστήριον τοῦ Κουτλουμουσίου, κἀκεῖσε προσκυνήσας, ἔγραψε καὶ χάριν μνημοσύνου δεκατρία ὀνόματα, ὑπὲρ ὧν ἀφιέρωσε διὰ γράμματος αὐτοῦ ὑπογεγραμμένου τὸ τρίτον μέρος ἁπαξαπάσης τῆς περιουσίας αὐτοῦ, ὅπως δοθῇ ἀμεταθέτως μετὰ θάνατον αὐτοῦ εἰς τὸ ῥηθὲν τουτὶ ἱερὸν μοναστήριον, ἐξαιρουμένου πρῶτον τοῦ χρέους αὐτοῦ καὶ τῶν ὧν ἀφῆκε τῇ γυναικὶ πραγμάτων. Ἐν τῷ ἀπαιτεῖσθαι δὲ δικαίως παρὰ τῶν ῥηθέντων πατέρων τὸ τρίτον μέρος τῶν καταληφθέντων πραγμάτων τοῦ ποτὲ Τριανταφύλλου, ἡ μὲν γυνὴ ἐκείνου πείθεται τῇ διαταγῇ τοῦ ἀνδρὸς αὐτῆς καὶ οὐκ ἀντιλέγει, ὁ δὲ ἐξάδελφος τοῦ ἀνδρὸς αὐτῆς Νικολάκης Χαστᾶς, οὐκ ἐᾷ λαβεῖν τοὺς πατέρας τὸ δίκαιον τοῦ μοναστηρίου αὐτῶν, ἐναντιούμενος διαφόρως τῇ εὐλόγῳ διαταγῇ τοῦ ποτὲ Τριανταφύλλου, καὶ προβάλλων ἐκτὸς τοῦ γνησίου χρέους ἐκείνου καὶ ἄλλα νόθα χρέη, καὶ ὅλως ζητῶν παντοιοτρόπως ζημιῶσαι τὸ μοναστήριον.

Ὅπερ μὴ ἀνεχόμενοι οἱ ἐν αὐτῷ ἀσκούμενοι πατέρες, προσέδραμον τῇ εὐθυδικίᾳ τῆς ἐκκλησίας, καὶ ἐδεήθησαν θερμῶς ἐκδοθῆναι τὸ παρὸν ἡμέτερον πατριαρχικὸν ἐκκλησιαστικὸν γράμμα εἰς ἀποκατάστασιν καὶ λῆψιν τῶν μοναστηριακῶν δικαίων αὐτῶν, καὶ κατὰ τοῦ ῥηθέντος Νικολάκη Χαστᾶ, ἔτι δὲ καὶ κατὰ τῶν σπευδόντων οἱῳδήτινι τρόπῳ ἀδικῆσαι τὸ ῥηθὲν μοναστήριον. Καὶ δὴ βεβαιωθέντες ἀκριβῶς ἀπὸ γράμματος τῆς σῆς ἱερότητος οὕτως ἔχειν τὴν ἀλήθειαν, γράφοντες ἀποφαινόμεθα συνοδικῶς μετὰ τῶν περὶ ἡμᾶς ἱερωτάτων ἀρχιερέων καὶ ὑπερτίμων τῶν ἐν ἁγίῳ πν(εύματι) ἀγαπητῶν ἡμῶν ἀδελφῶν καὶ συλλειτουργῶν, ἵνα ὁ ῥηθεὶς Νικολάκης Χαστᾶς, πρωτεξάδελφος τοῦ ποτὲ Τριανταφύλλου, καὶ ὅσοι ἄλλοι τῶν χριστιανῶν, ἄνδρες ἢ γυναῖκες, συγγενεῖς ἢ ξένοι, νέοι ἢ γέροντες, σπεύδουσι τρόπῳ οἱῳδήτινι ἀδικῆσαι τὸ ῥηθὲν μοναστήριον, ἂν μὴ οὗτοι πάντες ἅμα τῷ ἀκοῦσαι καὶ ἰδεῖν τὸ παρὸν ἡμέτερον τῆς τελείας ἐκκλησιαστικῆς ἀποφάσεως γράμμα, παυσάμενοι πάσης ἀντιλογίας καὶ ἐναντιότητος, ἀφήσωσι λαβεῖν τὸ μοναστήριον τὸ τρίτον μέρος τῶν καταληφθέντων πραγμάτων τοῦ ποτὲ Τριανταφύλλου, μετὰ τὴν ἑξαίρεσιν τοῦ γνησίου χρέους ἐκείνου καὶ τῶν ὧν ἀφῆκε τῇ γυναικὶ αὐτοῦ πραγμάτων, κατὰ τὴν διαταγὴν ἐκείνου, καὶ κατὰ τὸ ὅπερ ἔχουσιν εἰς χεῖρας αὐτῶν οἱ πατέρες ἐνυπόγραφον ἐκείνου ἀφιερωτικὸν γράμμα, ἀλλὰ προφασιζόμενοι διαφόρως ἀντιλέγοντές τε καὶ ἑτέρου νόθου χρέους προσθήκην ποιούμενοι καὶ ὅλως μετερχόμενοι τρόπους πολυειδεῖς ἐπὶ τῷ ἀδικῆσαι τὸ μοναστήριον, φανῶσιν ἀπειθεῖς καὶ παρήκοοι τῶν πατριαρχικῶν ἡμῶν καὶ συνοδικῶν ἑπιταγῶν, καὶ οὐκ ἐάσωσι λαβεῖν τὸ μοναστήριον τὸ δίκαιον αὐτοῦ, οἱ τοιοῦτοι ὁποῖοι ἂν ὦσιν μετὰ τοῦ ῥηθέντος κακεντρεχοῦς καὶ κακοτρόπου Νικολάκη Χαστᾶ ἀφωρισμένοι εἴησαν ἀπὸ Θεοῦ καὶ κατηραμένοι καὶ ἀσυγχώρητοι καὶ μετὰ θάνατον ἄλυτοι, αἱ πέτραι καὶ ὁ σίδηρος λυθείησαν, αὐτοὶ δὲ μηδαμῶς, κληρονομήσειαν τὴν λέπραν τοῦ Γιεζῆ καὶ τὴν ἀγχόνην τοῦ Ἰούδα, ἡ ὀργὴ τοῦ Θεοῦ εἴη ἐπὶ τὰς κεφαλὰς αὐτῶν, καὶ ἡ μερὶς αὐτῶν μετὰ τοῦ προδότου Ἰούδα, καὶ προκοπὴν μήποτε ἴδοιεν, ἔχοντες καὶ τὰς ἀρὰς πάντων τῶν ἀπ’ αἰῶνος ὁσίων καὶ θεοφόρων τῆς ἐκκλησίας πατέρων, ὁ δὲ ῥηθεὶς Νικολάκης Χαστᾶς ὡς φιλάδικος, κακότροπος καὶ μαθητὴς τοῦ διαβόλου ὑπάρχῃ καὶ ἔξω τῆς τοῦ Χ(ριστο)ῦ ἐκκλησίας καὶ τῆς τῶν χριστιανῶν συναναστροφῆς, συνομιλίας καὶ ὁμηγύρεως, μηδεὶς ἐκκλησιάσῃ αὐτὸν ἢ ἁγιάσῃ ἢ θυμιάσῃ ἢ συναναστραφῇ αὐτῷ ἐξ ἀποφάσεως. ͵αφπη^ω.

    ΕΝ ΜΗΝΙ ΑΥΓΟΥΣΤΩ ΙΝΔΙΚΤΙΩΝΟΣ ϛ^ης:—

    ☩ Ὁ Καισαρείας Γρηγόριος ☩ Ὁ Ἐφέσου Σαμουήλ
—☩ Ὁ Ἠρακλείας Μεθόδιος ☩ Ὁ Κυζίκου Ἀγάπιος
—☩ Ὁ Νικομηδίας Γεράσιμος ☩ Ὁ Δέρκων Ἀνανίας
—☩ Ὁ Τορνόβου Καλλίνικος ☩ Ὁ Λαρίσσης Μελέτιος
—☩ Ὁ Ἄρτης Μακάριος.

* Acta Monasterii Cutlumusii Acta, Eccl. et Legal.,
Επιστολή Πατριάρχου Προκοπίου [Epistula Procopii patriarchae] (a./περ. 1788).

Source: / Πηγή:
P. Lemerle,
Actes de Kutlumus [Archives de l'Athos II (2). Paris: P. Lethielleux, 1945/1988]: 208-209.

Ο Αλέξανδρος Ιωάννης Κούζα & οι μεταρρυθμίσεις του σχετικά με τις μοναστηριακές περιουσίες /Alexander John Cuza & his reforms concerning the monastic property

Alexander John Cuza (in Romanian Alexandru Ioan Cuza pronounced [alekˈsandru iˈo̯an ˈkuza]; 20 March 1820 – 15 May 1873) was a Moldavian-born Romanian politician who ruled as the first Domnitor of the United Principalities of Wallachia and Moldavia between 1859 and 1866.

Early life
Born in Bârlad, Cuza belonged to the traditional boyar class in Moldavia, being the son of Ispravnic Ioan Cuza (who was also a landowner in Fălciu County) and his wife Sultana (or Soltana), a member of the Cozadini family of Phanariote origins. Alexander received an urbane European education, becoming an officer in the Moldavian Army (rising to the rank of colonel). He married Elena Rosetti in 1844.

In 1848, known as the year of European revolutions, Moldavia and Wallachia fell into revolt. The Moldavian unrest was quickly suppressed, but in Wallachia the revolutionaries took power and governed during the summer (see 1848 Wallachian revolution). Young Cuza played a prominent enough part to establish his liberal credentials during the Moldavian episode and to be shipped to Vienna as a prisoner, where he soon made his escape with British support.

Returned during the rule of Prince Grigore Alexandru Ghica, he became Moldavia's minister of war in 1858, and represented Galaţi in the ad hoc Divan at Iaşi, acting under the guarantee of the European Powers in the wake of the Crimean War to nominate a prince for Moldavia. Cuza was a prominent speaker in the debates and strongly advocated the union of Moldavia and Walachia. In default of a foreign prince, he was himself nominated in both countries by the pro-unionist Partida Naţională (profiting from an ambiguity in the text of the governing Treaty of Paris) and elected prince of Moldavia on 17 January 1859 (5 January Julian) and, after street pressure changed the vote in Bucharest, of Wallachia on 5 February 1859 (24 January Julian).

Although he and his wife Elena Rosetti had no children, she raised as her own children his two sons by his mistress Elena Maria Catargiu-Obrenović: Alexandru Al. Ioan Cuza (born between 1862 and 1864–1889), and Dimitrie Cuza (1865–1888 suicide).

Reign
Diplomatic efforts
Thus Cuza achieved a de facto union of the two principalites. The Powers backtracked, Napoleon III of the French Empire remaining supportive, while the Austrian ministry withheld approval of such a union at the Congress of Paris (18 October 1858); partly as a consequence, Cuza's authority was not recognized by his nominal suzerain, Abdülaziz, the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire, until 23 December 1861, (and, even then, the union was only accepted for the duration of Cuza's rule).

The union was formally declared three years later, on 5 February 1862, (24 January Julian), the new country bearing the name of Romania, with Bucharest as its capital city.

Cuza invested his diplomatic actions in gaining further concessions from the Powers: the sultan's assent to a single unified parliament and cabinet for Cuza's lifetime, in recognition of the complexity of the task. Thus, he was regarded as the political embodiment of a unified Romania.

Reforms
Assisted by his councilor Mihail Kogălniceanu, an intellectual leader of the 1848 revolution, Cuza initiated a series of reforms that contributed to the modernization of Romanian society and of state structures.

His first measure addressed a need for increasing the land resources and revenues available to the state, by "secularizing" (confiscating) monastic assets (1863). Probably more than a quarter of Romania's farmland was controlled by untaxed Eastern Orthodox "Dedicated Monasteries", which supported Greek and other foreign monks in shrines such as Mount Athos and Jerusalem (a substantial drain on state revenues). Cuza got his parliament's backing to expropriate these lands. He offered compensation to the Greek Orthodox Church, but Sophronius III, the Patriarch of Constantinople, refused to negotiate; after several years, the Romanian government withdrew its offer and no compensation was ever paid. State revenues thereby increased without adding any domestic tax burden.

The land reform, liberating peasants from the last corvées, freeing their movements and redistributing some land (1864), was less successful. In attempting to create a solid support base among the peasants, Cuza soon found himself in conflict with the group of Conservatives. A liberal bill granting peasants title to the land they worked was defeated. Then the Conservatives responded with a bill that ended all peasant dues and responsibilities, but gave landlords title to all the land. Cuza vetoed it, then held a plebiscite to alter the Paris Convention (the virtual constitution), in the manner of Napoleon III.

His plan to establish universal manhood suffrage, together with the power of the Domnitor to rule by decree, passed by a vote of 682,621 to 1,307. He consequently governed the country under the provisions of Statutul dezvoltător al Convenţiei de la Paris ("Statute expanding the Paris Convention"), an organic law adopted on July 15, 1864. With his new plenary powers, Cuza then promulgated the Agrarian Law of 1863. Peasants received title to the land they worked, while landlords retained ownership of one third. Where there was not enough land available to create workable farms under this formula, state lands (from the confiscated monasteries) would be used to give the landowners compensation.

Despite the attempts by Lascăr Catargiu's cabinet to force a transition in which some corvées were to be maintained, Cuza's reform marked the disappearance of the boyar class as a privileged group, and led to a channeling of energies into capitalism and industrialization; at the same time, however, land distributed was still below necessities, and the problem became stringent over the following decades – as peasants reduced to destitution sold off their land or found that it was insufficient for the needs of their growing families.

Cuza's reforms also included the adoption of the Criminal Code and the Civil Code based on the Napoleonic code (1864), a Law on Education, establishing tuition-free, compulsory public education for primary schools (1864; the system, nonetheless, suffered from drastic shortages in allocated funds). He founded the University of Iaşi (1860) and the University of Bucharest (1864), and helped develop of a modern, European-style Romanian Army, under a working relationship with France.

Downfall and exile
Cuza failed in his effort to create an alliance of prosperous peasants and a strong liberal prince, ruling as a benevolent authoritarian in the style of Napoleon III. Having to rely on a decreasing group of hand-picked bureaucrats, Cuza began facing a mounting opposition after his land reform bill, with liberal landowners voicing concerns over his ability to represent their interests. Along with financial distress, there was an awkward scandal that revolved around his mistress, Maria Catargi-Obrenović, and popular discontent culminated in a coup d'état. Cuza was forced to abdicate by the so-called "Monstrous Coalition" of Conservatives and Liberals. At four o'clock on the morning of February 22, 1866, a group of military conspirators broke into the palace, and compelled the prince to sign his abdication. On the following day they conducted him safely across the frontier.

His successor, Prince Karl of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, was proclaimed Domnitor as Carol I of Romania on 20 April 1866. The election of a foreign prince with ties to an important princely house, legitimizing Romanian independence (which Carol came to do after the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878), had been one of the liberal aims in the revolution of 1848. Despite the participation of Ion Brătianu and other future leaders of the Liberal Party in the overthrow of Cuza, he remained a hero to the radical and republican wing, who, as Francophiles, had an additional reason to oppose a Prussian monarch; anti-Carol riots in Bucharest during the Franco-Prussian War (see History of Bucharest) and the coup attempt known as the Republic of Ploieşti in August 1870, the conflict was eventually resolved by the compromise between Brătianu and Carol, with the arrival of a prolonged and influential Liberal cabinet.

Cuza spent the remainder of his life in exile, chiefly in Paris, Vienna and Wiesbaden, accompanied by his wife, his mistress, and his two sons. He died in Heidelberg. His remains were buried in his residence in Ruginoasa, but were moved to the Trei Ierarhi Cathedral in Iaşi after World War II.

(English Wikipedia)