.

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

Ο Μιχαήλ Σερβέτος & ο Σατανάς /

Michael Servetus & Satan



*



“Videtis quantas vires habeat Sathan, cum aliquem possidet, hic homo est doctus imprimis, et fortasse se recte facere putavit, sed nunc possidetur a Diabolo, quod idem vobis accidere posset.”

«Βλέπετε τι δύναμη έχει ο Σατανάς, όταν καταλαμβάνει κάποιον. Αυτός ο άνθρωπος είναι λόγιος πρώτης διαλογής και πιθανώς πίστευε ότι ενεργούσε ορθά· αλλά έχει καταληφθεί πλέον από τον Διάβολο· το ίδιο ακριβώς θα μπορούσε να συμβεί στον καθένα σας».

“Ye see what force hath Satan, when he taketh possession of anyone. This man is a scholar of the first rank, and deemed perchance that he was acting rightly; but now is he possessed of the devil; the very same fate might have overtaken one of you.”


Historia mortis Serveti (1554),
in Johann Lorenz von Mosheim,
Historia Michaelis Serveti
(1727),
p. 159.

Historia mortis Serveti
(An Account of the Death of Servetus,
transl. A. Gordon),
Roland H. Bainton,
Hunted Heretic: The Life and Death of Michael Servetus, 1511-1553 (2005),
p./σ. 152.







*   *



Friday, December 19, 2014

The palimpsest Ms. O 39 Sup. (Rahlfs 1098)
of the Ambrosian Library in Milan
(late 9th cent. C.E.)
& the sacred Tetragrammaton /

Το παλίμψηστο χειρόγραφο O 39 Sup. (Rahlfs 1098)
της Αμβροσιανής Βιβλιοθήκης του Μιλάνου
(τέλη 9ου αι. Κ.Χ.)
& το ιερό Τετραγράμματο



*





Giovanni Mercati,

Codex rescriptus Bybliothecae Ambrosianae O 39 SVP:
phototypice expressus et transcriptus
.
Codices ex ecclesiasticis Italiae bybliothecis delecti
phototype expressi iussu Pii XI. Pont. Max. consilio
et studio procuratorum Bybliothecae Vaticanae; Vol. 8, 1958,

frag. 11, fol. 105r (pp. 10, 11).





*


The Milan Palimpsest Greek
Milan, Ambrosian Library, O 39 Sup. A Palimpsest, Rahlfs 1098. The upper text is of little value, being merely a late (thirteenth century or later) copy of the Orthodox service book known as the Οκτώηχος. But two of the lower leaves are copies of a text based, in some form, on Origen’s Hexapla. The Hexapla of course contained six columns: Hebrew (in Hebrew letters). Hebrew (transcribed in Greek letters), Aquila, Symmachus, LXX, and Theodotian (plus occasional other versions). The Milan fragments include five of these columns: Hebrew in Greek letters (except that the tetragrammaton is written in Hebrew), Aquila, Symmachus, LXX, and — it is believed — Quinta. (The inclusion of Quinta in this manuscript is part of why there are so many vexed questions about Theodotian, Quinta, and kaige.) The total text is minimal — about 150 verses of Psalms. And the copy is much later than Origen’s original — it’s thought to be ninth or tenth century. But it gives us one of our few looks at the actual format of the Hexapla. * *



Sunday, December 14, 2014

The Gospel of Judas
& the unutterable Tetragrammaton /

Το Ευαγγέλιο του Ιούδα
& το άρρητο Τετραγράμματο






Judas [said] to him , “I know who you are and where you have come from. You are from the immortal realm of Barbelo. And I am not worthy to utter the name of the one who has sent you.”


Ο Ιούδας [είπε] σ' αυτόν <τον Ιησού>, «Γνωρίζω ποιος είσαι και από πού έρχεσαι. Κατάγεσαι από τον αθάνατο κόσμο του Μπάρμπελο <Βαρβηλώ>. Και είμαι ανάξιος να προφέρω το όνομα του ενός που σε έχει στείλει».

— Gospel of Judas / Ευαγγέλιο Ιούδα 35:15-21.


[Judas Iscariot] stands before Jesus, averts his eyes, apparently in a respectful manner, and offers a profession, from a Sethian gnostic point of view, of who Jesus really is. Judas states before Jesus, “I know who you are and where you have come from. You have come from the immortal aeon of Barbelo, and I am not worthy to utter the name of the one who has sent you” (35,15-21). With a term from Hebrew, Barbelo, perhaps meaning something like “God in four” (that is, God in the tetragrammaton, the four-letter ineffable name of the divine), this profession declares that Jesus is from a transcendent realm far beyond this mortal world, and that the name of the one sending Jesus to this world is too holy to utter.

* Marvin W. Meyer,
The Gospel of Judas: On a Night with Judas Iscariot,
Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2011,
p./σ. 8.


Information about the Gospel of Judas: / Πληροφορίες για το Ευαγγέλιο του Ιούδα:

Wilhelm Schneemelcher, ed., transl. by R. McL. Wilson,
New Testament Apocrypha: Gospels and Related Writings,
Louisville: John Knox Press, 1992,
pp./σσ. 386-387.



Tuesday, December 2, 2014

"The God" as a nomen sacrum
and "a God/god" (with the indefinite/without article)
within the Bohairic Coptic NT at 4th cent. C.E. /

"Ο Θεός" ως nomen sacrum
και "Θεός/θεός" (με αόριστο/χωρίς άρθρο)
στην Βοχαϊρική Κοπτική ΚΔ του 4ου αι. Κ.Χ.







George William Horner,
The Coptic version of the New Testament in the northern dialect, Vol. 2,
Oxford University Press, 1898.





 Rodolphe Kasser (ed.),
Papyrus Bodmer, III. Evangile de Jean et Genese I-IV, 2 en bohairique.
Copt. 25. (Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium)
,
Peeters Publishers, 1958.
Sahidic Coptic / Σαχιδική Κοπτική:

ϨΝ ΤЄϨΟΥЄΙΤЄ ΝЄϤϢΟΟΠ ΝϬΙΠϢΑϪЄ,
ΑΥѠ ΠϢΑϪЄ ΝЄϤϢΟΟΠ ΝΝΑϨΡΜ ΠΝΟΥΤЄ.
ΑΥѠ ΝЄΥΝΟΥΤЄ ΠЄ ΠϢΑϪЄ.

 



Sunday, November 16, 2014

Normal Greek counterparts
of MT vowels in Genesis LXX
by F. Knobloch /

Τα κανονικά ελληνικά αντίστοιχα
των φωνηέντων του ΜΚ στην Ο' της Γένεσης
υπό F. Knobloch




* Frederick W. Knobloch,
Hebrew sounds in Greek script: Transcriptions and related phenomena in the Septuagint, with special focus on Genesis
(Εβραϊκοί φθόγγοι σε ελληνική γραφή: Μεταγραφές και σχετικά φαινόμενα στην Εβδομήκοντα, με ιδιαίτερη εστίαση στη Γένεση)
,
A dissertation in Asian and Middle Eastern Studies,
University of Pennsylvania, 1995,
p./σ. 167.



Wednesday, November 12, 2014

The torments of the Devil
in the lake of fire and sulphur /

Ο βασανισμός του Διαβόλου
στη λίμνη της φωτιάς και του θειαφιού





καὶ ὁ διάβολος ὁ πλανῶν αὐτοὺς ἐβλήθη εἰς τὴν λίμνην τοῦ πυρὸς καὶ θείου, ὅπου καὶ τὸ θηρίον καὶ ὁ ψευδοπροφήτης, καὶ βασανισθήσονται ἡμέρας καὶ νυκτὸς εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων.

and the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulphur where the beast and the false prophet were, and they will be tormented day and night for ever and ever. (RSV)

Revelation / Αποκάλυψη 20:10
(+ Mat / Ματ 24:41).




* George Eldon Ladd,
A Commentary on the Revelation of John
[Σχολιολόγιο στην Αποκάλυψη του Ιωάννη]
,
Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1972,
pp./σσ. 270, 271.




Lamentations 4:20:
«χριστὸς κυρίου» or «χριστὸς κύριος»?
A reading in all the modern LXX editions
that is harmonised with the MT
but is in contradiction
of the unanimous LXX manuscript testimony
of a Christian mistranslation

Θρήνοι 4:20:
«χριστὸς κυρίου» ή «χριστὸς κύριος»;
Μια γραφή σε όλες τις σύγχρονες εκδόσεις της Ο'
που αποτελεί εναρμόνιση με το ΜΚ
αλλά συγκρούεται
με την ομόφωνη μαρτυρία των χειρογράφων της Ο'
για μια χριστιανική λανθασμένη μετάφραση





Lamentations / Θρήνοι 4:20:



All the modern LXX editions
(harmonised with the MT
"מְשִׁ֣יחַ יְהוָ֔ה"):

Πνεῦμα προσώπου ἡμῶν
χριστὸς κυρίου
συνελήμφθη ἐν ταῖς διαφθοραῖς αὐτῶν,
οὗ εἴπαμεν ᾿
Εν τῇ σκιᾷ αὐτοῦ ζησόμεθα ἐν τοῖς ἔθνεσιν.


Christian LXX manuscript tradition:

Πνεῦμα προσώπου ἡμῶν
χριστὸς κύριος
συνελήμφθη ἐν ταῖς διαφθοραῖς αὐτῶν,
οὗ εἴπαμεν
᾿Εν τῇ σκιᾷ αὐτοῦ ζησόμεθα ἐν τοῖς ἔθνεσιν.



Saturday, October 4, 2014

Ποιος είναι «ὁ Ὤν» (Εξ 3:14)
κατά τον Ιωάννη τον Χρυσόστομο; /

Who is the "I AM" (Ex 3:14)
according to John the Chrysostom?



CBd-814


Βούλει καὶ τὸ ἀΐδιον μαθεῖν; Ἄκουσον τί φησιν ὁ Μωϋσῆς περὶ τοῦ Πατρός. Ἐρωτήσας γὰρ, εἰ ἐρωτηθείη παρὰ τῶν Αἰγυπτίων, τίς ὁ ἀπεσταλκὼς αὐτὸν εἴη, τί ποτε δὴ καὶ ἀποκρίνηται πρὸς αὐτοὺς, κελεύεται εἰπεῖν, ὅτι Ὁ ὢν ἀπέσταλκέ με. Τὸ δὲ, Ὁ ὢν, τοῦ ἀεὶ εἶναι σημαντικόν ἐστι, καὶ τοῦ ἀνάρχως εἶναι, καὶ τοῦ ὄντως εἶναι καὶ κυρίως.

* Ιωάννης Χρυσόστομος, Ομιλία 15, PG 59:99, 100.

Θέλεις δε να μάθης και την αϊδιότητά του; Άκουσε τι λέγει ο Μωυσής δια τον Πατέρα. Όταν ερώτησε τι να απαντήση εάν τον ερωτήσουν οι Αιγύπτιοι ποιος είναι αυτός που τον απέστειλε, διατάσσεται να ειπή ότι «με απέστειλεν ο Ων»· το δε «ο ων» σημαίνει ότι υπάρχει αιωνίως, και χωρίς αρχήν και πραγματικώς.

* ΕΠΕ 39:719 (μετάφρ. Παν. Παπαευαγγέλου).

Wouldest thou learn also His eternity? Hear what Moses saith concerning the Father. When he asked what he was commanded to answer should the Jews enquire of him, "Who it was that had sent him," he heard these words: "Say, I AM hath sent me." (Ex. iii. 14.) Now the expression "I AM," is significative of Being ever, and Being without beginning, of Being really and absolutely.

* John Chrysostom, Homily 15, NPNF(S1) 14:52 (ed. Ph. Schaff).

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

G. D. Chryssides
on Jehovah's Witnesses /

Ο G. D. Chryssides
σχετικά με τους Μάρτυρες του Ιεχωβά










Jehovah’s Witnesses

Of all the offshoots of Adventism, the Jehovah’s Witnesses are probably the best known. The organisation, legally incorporated as The Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania, owes its origins to Charles Taze Russell (1852-1916). Russell dissociated himself with Adventism, although he had been acquainted with a number of Adventist groups. None of them had satisfied him, until he heard the Adventist preacher Jonas Wendell (1815-1873) preaching. This prompted him to start his own Bible study group in 1870, which grew to become the International Bible Students’ Association (IBSA). Although Russell and the subsequent Jehovah’s Witnesses do not regard themselves as Adventist, they have much in common with them. Like Adventists, they believe that the final battle of Armageddon is imminent, that biblical prophecies have a present-day application, and a pattern of end-time events can be given dates in accordance with biblical predictions. Russell and his followers also were unable to accept the mainstream Protestant Christian doctrines of predestination and eternal damnation.

In common with Adventism, Russell and his followers had an implicit belief in the inerrancy of scripture, and his emphasis on the Bible caused him to question certain key doctrines that had become part of mainstream Christianity. One such doctrine was the Trinity, to which he could find no explicit references in the Bible, but which was nevertheless affirmed by the mainstream churches, including the Adventists. The Adventists taught that Roman Catholicism was a corruption of Christianity, equating it with Babylon the Great (Revelation 17:5). Russell went further, claiming that all the churches were corrupt, not just Rome. The IBSA and the Jehovah’s Witnesses have been entirely lay-led, unlike most branches of Christianity, including Adventism, which have clergy. Russell also disagreed with the Adventist belief that the earth would be burnt at the end of time, teaching that it would be renewed, to be inhabited by God’s faithful who had lived before Christ’s ministry.

After Russell died in 1916, a power struggle among some of the early leaders ensued. A number of schismatical organisations emerged as a result, while Joseph Franklin (‘Judge’) Rutherford (1869-1941) gained control of the Watch Tower organisation and its assets. Possibly to distinguish his own organisation from the splinter groups, he gave the name ‘Jehovah’s Witnesses’ to the organisation in 1931. Rutherford introduced a number of new features that have become the Witnesses’ hallmarks. He maintained a firm anti-war stance, causing his followers to be regarded as unpatriotic; to this day Witnesses will not take part in armed combat. Rutherford also wanted to purge the organisation of all the ‘pagan’ practices that had crept into Christianity: the celebration of Christmas and birthdays, and ideas that had entered Christianity through pagan philosophy, such as the immortality of the soul. He also introduced house-to-house evangelism, in accordance with early Church practice (Acts 5:42). During the Rutherford period, Witnesses came to believe that the Watch Tower Society exclusively offered the means of salvation.

Witnesses are publicly perceived as setting dates for ‘the end of the world’, but continually changing them when they fail to materialise. This is somewhat of a misunderstanding. Two predicted dates — 1925 and 1975 — resulted in failed expectations, even on the Society’s own admission. (Rutherford had predicted that the ancient patriarchs would return from the dead in 1925, and 1975 was believed to mark the end of the sixth millennium, possibly heralding Armageddon.) Some dates have been re-assigned to different events, and Jehovah’s Witnesses are now much less prone to associate prophetic dates with earthly political events. One key date proposed by Russell, which Jehovah’s Witnesses continue to regard as significant, is 1914. At one time Russell expected God’s kingdom to have been established on earth by that date, but later came to assign it to Christ’s parousia (‘presence’), teaching that Christ began his heavenly rule on that date, preparing his kingdom for his faithful ones.

According to Watch Tower teaching, Christ is gathering his faithful — the ‘anointed class’ of 144,000 — into heaven. Initially it was expected that all Russell’s Bible Students would attain the heavenly kingdom, but of course the number of Witnesses is now well in excess of 144,000. (In 2008, some 17,790,631 people attended the annual Memorial, the service commemorating Jesus’ final meal with his disciples. Not all of those were active Witnesses, however.) In 1935 Rutherford declared that there were two classes of individual: those who belonged to the ‘heavenly class’ (the 144,000) and those who belonged to the ‘great crowd’ (Revelation 7:9-10). Most present-day Witnesses regard themselves as belonging to the latter class, and expect everlasting life on the renewed earth after Armageddon.

Mention should be made of the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ stance on blood — another source of public comment. During World War II, blood transfusion was becoming a common medical procedure, and the Governing Body defined its stance on the matter. It was perceived as a violation of God’s command to Noah: ‘. . . you must not eat meat that has its lifeblood still in it’ (Genesis 9:4). Two points are noting about this injunction. First, the reference is primarily to a food law, and Witnesses typically avoid foods that are made from blood, such as black pudding. Second, Witnesses do not hold that all the Old Testament laws have force. They represent the ‘old covenant’, and are only binding if they are reinforced by the New Testament. Witnesses find reinforcement for this commandment in the First Jerusalem Council’s ruling, that the Gentiles should ‘abstain . . . from blood’ (Acts 15:20). It should be noted that the word is ‘abstain’ here, which is taken to have a wider application than simply eating. As in all matters, the Bible is regarded as the final arbiter, and the Watch Tower Society has never produced any independent creed or set of principles. Its teachings are disseminated to the public principally through its monthly magazines The Watchtower and Awake!

* George D. Chryssides,
“Christianity at the Edges”,
in
George D. Chryssides & Margaret Z. Wilkins (eds),
Christians in the Twenty-First Century
,     
*
Routledge, 2014,
pp. 405-407 [399-428].





*

Friday, September 12, 2014

Is the LXX
the Bible of the Orthodox Church? /

Είναι η Εβδομήκοντα
η Βίβλος της Ορθόδοξης Εκκλησίας;





«Συνεπῶς, τό νά εἰπωθεῖ ὅτι ἡ Ὀρθόδοξη Ἐκκλησία διαβάζει τό κείµενο τῆς Παλαιᾶς ∆ιαθήκης στά ἑλληνικά ἀπό τή µετάφραση τῶν Ο΄ ἀποτελεῖ ὑπεραπλούστευση».

[“Thus, to say that the Orthodox Church reads the Old Testament in Greek from the Septuagint is an  oversimplification.”]



* Ιωάννης Φωτόπουλος / John Fotopoulos,
«Ορθόδοξος χριστιανισμός και ιστορική κριτική της Βίβλου»
(“Orthodox Christianity and Historical Criticism of the Bible”),

Δελτίο Βιβλικών Μελετών,
τόμ. 29Β (Ιούλιος-Δεκέμβριος 2011),
έκδοση Ιούνιος 2014, σ./p. 67 [63–78].
[Ελληνικά/Greek, PDF]